The Ebb and Flow of Controversial Debates on Social Media

Northern Bytes

By Kiran Garimella and Michael Mathioudakis

Our recent paper titled ‘The Effect of Collective Attention on Controversial Debates on Social Media’ (arXiv link) won the best student paper award at the 9th ACM Web Science conference held in Troy, New York.

The paper studies the evolution of long-lived controversial debates on Twitter – i.e., discussions on topics such as ‘gun control’ or ‘abortion’, that reveal a split of opinion between people who support different sides of the argument.

The main goal of this work is to study dynamic aspects of controversial debates — in particular: (i) whether controversy around the debates has increased over time; and (ii) whether controversy increases or decreases when major associated events occur.

Data

The dataset consists of an 1% sample of Twitter of all tweets generated between September 2011 and September 2016, as published by Twitter and stored on the Internet Archive (

View original post 526 more words

Papers accepted at WebSci 2017

Two full and two short papers I co-authored have been accepted to Web Science 2017:

Full papers:
The Effect of Collective Attention on Controversial Debates on Social Media‘, with K. Garimella, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Gionis.
‘Recommendations for groups in location-based social networks‘, Frederick Ayala, B. Daróczy, A. Benczur, A. Gionis.

Short papers:
Ad-blocking: A study on Performance, Privacy, and Counter-measures‘, with K. Garimella, O. Kostakis.
Factors in Recommending Contrarian Content on Social Media‘, with K. Garimella, G. De Francisci Morales, A. Gionis.

Best Student Paper award at WSDM

We just heard that our paper on “Balancing Opposing Views to Reduce Controversy” (available on the ACM Digital Library) was nominated for best paper at WSDM 2017.

bpnom-wsdm2017

Update: Cornell received the best paper award – and our paper the best student paper award, with Kiran as first author.